In this week’s issue, we explain why the Panthers should trade away their best player: 

The Carolina Panthers are 1-3 with an offense that looks like one of the worst in the league and a head coach who’s been on the hot seat since last December. There’s still three-quarters of the schedule to go, but unfortunately it looks like Carolina has already played through the easy stretch. 

The remaining schedule for the #Panthers. If you can’t look around the room and find the cupcake, it means you’re it…🧁

3-9 at the bye would be an upset. 2-10 more likely. pic.twitter.com/Pm5srdk1H0

— Logan Ulrich (@loganulrich) October 6, 2022

We’re barely into October, but plenty of fans are already starting to look ahead to coaching candidates and draft prospects — and they’re not wrong. The Panthers probably have better odds of finishing with the No. 1 pick than they do of turning this season around and saving HC Matt Rhule’s job. 

The team won’t really turn its attention to next year for a few more weeks at the earliest but when it does, there’s a strong case to be made that trading RB Christian McCaffrey should be their top order of business. The veteran running back has been one of a few bright spots for the Panthers in 2022. Despite various nicks and bruises sending him to the injury report each week, McCaffrey has played every game and largely carried his usual load. Don’t let anyone tell you any differently — he still looks like one of football’s most dangerous offensive players. 

📺: #AZvsCAR on FOX 📱: Stream on NFL+ https://t.co/9lU7qSdJtG pic.twitter.com/O8yFFuqvsc

Christian McCaffrey picked up a 1st down on this pic.twitter.com/2GvXnG6F4b

— Hayden Winks (@HaydenWinks) September 27, 2022

But not even McCaffrey will be able to outrun the realities of the running back position forever. Carolina is going nowhere this year and probably not in 2023 either if that ends up being the first year of a rebuild. McCaffrey turns 27 next June and that’s getting dangerously close to the running back cliff year of 30. By the time the Panthers are ready to compete, McCaffrey could be on the downslope of his career. 

There’s a case to be made that McCaffrey’s greatest value to the Panthers could come as an asset rather than on the field. Looking ahead to 2023, the Panthers are not in good cap shape, especially for a team that’s going to be trying to patch a ton of holes. Over The Cap ranks them 30th in the NFL in effective cap space, which takes into account signing draft picks and filling out the roster. They’re $11.5 million in the red right now for next year and will need to make some cuts this offseason. 

Carolina’s draft pick stash is also lacking. They’re down to four picks in 2023, including no third-rounder, and five picks in 2024 with no fourth-rounder if current starting QB Baker Mayfield hits 70 percent of the snaps. One of Panthers GM Scott Fitterer’s roster-building tenets is that he can recoup additional picks by trading back in the draft but it’s still tough to build a team when you’re limited in both the draft and free agency. 

Trading McCaffrey wouldn’t create a ton of cap space but it would clear his number from the books in future years. It could also potentially add another nice pick or two to help the Panthers rebuild. 

This is where things start to get complicated, however, and the idea of trading McCaffrey starts to venture into fantasy rather than practicality. It doesn’t make any sense for the Panthers to give him away for a fourth-round pick. They need premium picks — ideally a first and no less than a multi-pick package featuring a second. For all of the same reasons it makes sense for the Panthers to trade McCaffrey, however, like his age and contract, those would be working against them in finding a buyer. 

Blockbuster deals for running backs were relatively common in the 1990s, but there haven’t been many big deals in recent years. The Texans gave up what ended up being a third-round pick for Duke Johnson in 2019, while the Rams dealt a sixth and a fourth for Sony Michel last year. Back in 2013, the Colts did give up a first-round pick for Trent Richardson, and the way that aged poorly is partially why teams have devalued the position so much. 

Also working against a trade is the fact that, for as inevitable as it seems Rhule will be fired in the coming months, he’s still trying to save his job and the team is still competing to win. If the Panthers traded McCaffrey, their best player, by the deadline in Week 8, they’re sending a message that everyone might as well pack up and go home. NFL teams just don’t operate that way. Coaches invest too much of their time and players sacrifice too much of their health for every game not to be treated as important. 

Still, it’s worth pointing out the Broncos made a deal in these circumstances last year, trading OLB Von Miller to the Rams for second and third-round picks. Miller was in a contract year, which is a key difference, but there’s at least some form of precedent if a compelling offer is out there for Carolina. 

Other factors working in the Panthers favor are that McCaffrey has already restructured his deal this offseason, meaning he’s making a minimum base salary and price won’t be an issue for an acquiring team in 2022 at least. His guarantees would also stay with the Panthers in a trade, with an acquiring team responsible for just $12 million a year over the remaining three years. If McCaffrey’s injury woes continue, they could cut him at any time with no penalty. 

For the sake of speculation, let’s assume the Panthers can drum up a fairly significant market for McCaffrey, and that for one reason or another they can manage the hit in the locker room. The first isn’t that far-fetched, the second is at least conceivable. There are five teams that stand out as potential landing spots 

The Bills aren’t hurting for offensive weapons but adding McCaffrey to that offense would put opposing defenses in a real bind. Defenses league-wide have put an emphasis on taking away the deep ball and making offenses stretch together long drives. Buffalo’s adapted pretty well to that this season and have been able to move the ball taking the underneath passes. 

But adding a weapon like McCaffrey would turbocharge the Bills. Some offensive players have a gravity around them that sucks in defensive players and commands their attention, freeing up space on the field for everyone else. If the Bills added McCaffrey to go with WR Stefon Diggs, they’d have two of those players, with McCaffrey pulling defenses closer to the line of scrimmage and Diggs stretching the field. The same would be true in the backfield with McCaffrey and QB Josh Allen creating the same type of misdirection Carolina used to be able to do with McCaffrey and Cam Newton. 

So no, the Bills don’t “need” to trade for McCaffrey. But he’s the type of weapon who could make an already explosive offense virtually unguardable. 

It’s notable that there were already reports earlier this offseason that the Bills looked into trading for McCaffrey as they explored their options for adding a receiving dimension out of the backfield. They did ultimately draft James Cook in the second round but he’s been brought along slowly as a rookie. As clear Super Bowl favorites, the Bills could also rationalize sending high picks to the Panthers for McCaffrey because they’d come at the end of the round.

There’s quite a bit of familiarity between players, coaches and front office personnel in the Buffalo and Carolina organizations, and in this scenario, McCaffrey would be the latest in a long Carolina-to-Buffalo pipeline. 

Denver seemed all set at running back about a week ago. Unfortunately, they lost rising star Javonte Williams to a major knee injury in Week 4. Things could be dramatically worse than having to turn to veteran Melvin Gordon, who’s a solid back in his own right. But losing Williams eliminates some punch from a Broncos offense that’s in desperate need of it. 

The Broncos don’t have a lot of draft capital after trading for QB Russell Wilson and they have bigger needs than the backfield. Still, it’s worth remembering McCaffrey’s dad played for the Broncos for nine seasons and he grew up in the Denver area, so there’s already a connection. If the Broncos took the approach of just trading for the best available offensive player, it could lead them to McCaffrey. 

You can’t completely write off Chiefs RB Clyde Edwards-Helaire but at this point he is not trending toward having his fifth-year option exercised this coming offseason. Kansas City pretty much has a three-way split backfield between him, seventh-round rookie Isiah Pacheco and veteran Jerick McKinnon. All three can take advantage of the opportunities schemed up by HC Andy Reid and from the wizardry of QB Patrick Mahomes, but none of them are truly dynamic players in their own right — at least not yet in Pacheco’s case. 

In fact, the Chiefs offense as a whole is lacking in guys who are a cinch to win one-on-one matchups. They have TE Travis Kelce who still looks like one of the league’s top tight ends, but outside of him it’s a mishmash of guys who might do one or two things really well, but overall are more limited. At some point, defenses might be able to expose that, although Kansas City just dissected a pretty good opponent in Tampa Bay. 

To get ahead of that, the Chiefs could be interested in trading for McCaffrey. He’d be a clear upgrade in the run game over the current committee — to make things less messy the Chiefs could send back Edwards-Helaire to Carolina and that might actually help grease the wheels for a deal by giving the Panthers a semi-palatable replacement. McCaffrey’s passing acumen would also be a boon for Mahomes by giving him another trusted target to lean on, while Reid would go nuts designing misdirection plays to take advantage of the attention McCaffrey commands. 

The fit isn’t quite as clean with the Chiefs as it is with the Bills. But keeping McCaffrey away from their AFC rivals itself is a pretty good reason to do the deal for the Chiefs. 

For someone as committed to the run game as he is, 49ers HC Kyle Shanahan has struggled to find a reliable running back since being hired by the 49ers back in 2018. The position is annually snakebit by injuries, which actually might not inspire a lot of confidence given McCaffrey’s injury history. 

Superstition aside though, McCaffrey would be the best back to suit up for San Francisco in years. He’s a terrific runner between the tackles, as he proved in his college career at nearby Stanford, and his pass-catching ability would provide another safety valve for QB Jimmy Garoppolo. Down the road, McCaffrey would also be a great player to lean on in 2023 when QB Trey Lance returns. 

One of the problems that’s been evident with the Rams in their slow start to the 2022 season has been the lack of a running game. Obviously the poor play of the offensive line, worsened by injuries, has been a major part of that but the Rams are also getting little out of Darrell Henderson and Cam Akers, the latter of whom seems to have lost some explosiveness after a torn Achilles last year despite his miraculous return after just five months. 

As a result, Rams HC Sean McVay has leaned even more into a transition that began last year with QB Matthew Stafford, moving the offense away from the play-action heavy attack it featured in McVay’s first few seasons and toward a more traditional dropback passing game. The Rams don’t have the receiving weapons to consistently make that work right now, though. They’re struggling to integrate WR Allen Robinson into the offense and leaning far too much on WR Cooper Kupp, making them stale and predictable. 

Trading for McCaffrey wouldn’t fix the offensive line, but it would make a lot of people’s jobs on offense easier in Los Angeles. For starters, McCaffrey is still capable of creating something out of nothing as a runner, which would be a big upgrade over what Henderson and Akers are providing right now. He’d also provide another reliable target for Stafford to turn to instead of Kupp, especially as an outlet and check down option if the line continues to leak. 

With McCaffrey in the fold, McVay could go back to the recipe he had with RB Todd Gurley that was so effective. They have a quarterback in Stafford who still gives them the ability to have more answers to what the defense is doing, but this would put less of the offensive burden on the shoulders of Stafford, Kupp and McVay. 

Obviously the big topic of discussion for a few days is going to be the Broncos and Wilson after yet another stinker of an offensive performance. And they deserve the fire. That might have been one of Wilson’s worst games as a pro, with numerous indefensible decisions. A lot of people, myself included, expected some growing pains with the Broncos offense. This seems to go a little beyond that. 

And yet, the narrative in the immediate aftermath of the game on social media seemed to be that Wilson is washed, the Seahawks were right to trade him, and the Broncos have just saddled themselves with one of the worst personnel mistakes in years between the picks and contract they gave up. 

Not so fast my friend. 

This article from FootballGuys.com’s Matt Waldman is a couple of weeks old and is written from more of a fantasy football perspective. But Waldman is a legitimate talent evaluator. His assessment and Wilson’s body of work carry a little more weight in my mind than some of the reactionary Twittercism aimed at dunking on people for likes. 

Be sure to follow NFL Trade Rumors on TWITTER  and FACEBOOK  for breaking NFL News and Rumors for all 32 teams!